Comments about cameraphone

There are 66 comments about "cameraphone"

Peter: so how about some photos? anyone in hutch got a camera or cameraphone, by any chance? it would be nice to actually see some of the town, as opposed to just reading endless blabber about......

in response to: America\'s Most Boring Towns: 10 by Scott Sargent

Peter: 4 years later, i saw a program about this crash on the history channel (sorry for the low-quality pics, but theyre cameraphone snaps of the tv screen, heh): [[img:26740]] [[img:26741]] ...

in response to: Helicopter Crash in Brooklyn by Peter

CartLegger: Great image, crisp lines for a cameraphone--must be one of those 2MP+ fancy Euro Phones. but I am so curious as to what this is......

in response to: Silvery Paste Up by elaine

Peter: yeah, actually... that and the fact that i no longer have a digicam (aside from my cameraphone) and i had a really bad hard-drive crash recently, etc... yeah, its been busy ;) more to come!...

in response to: Valves and Shadows by Peter

CartLegger: If you need a good cameraphone with lots of space, try a Sony Ericcson W810i (cingular). With a 4 GB card, I use it for my MP3 player, recorder, and camera. And its like a real......

in response to: Is It Something I Said? by CartLegger

Peter: i shit you not- i walked past this exact phone two days ago, transferring to the Q to 7th Ave after a stop at the Atlantic Target... and didnt snap a photo of it myself......

in response to: Is It Something I Said? by CartLegger

Peter: [[img:19011]] sorry for the lo-fi {cameraphone} shots, but ive no digicam at the moment......

in response to: The Bushwick Initiative: Holistic Redevelopment or Urban Renewal Retrofit? by upfromflames

Jamie: i wish i could have a lucid dream. ahhhhhh. these are good shots for a phone. what phone do you have. it's better than mine. i have cameraphone envy....

in response to: Camera Phone - Aug. 06 by ksedge

Jamie: totally. the overall quality of a photo lies more in the person pressing the shutter release than it does in the quality of the equipment used. certainly a nice shiny lens helps a lot but......

in response to: Heidelberg Doll House by Cosmo

Peter: clearer non-{cameraphone} photos from inside: [[img:14839]] [[img:14840]] ...

in response to: No. 1 Kitchen, Part 2: by Peter

EvilGentleman: [[img:14331]] Our old cameras, as taken with my current camera. Kodak DC280 2MP $810 in 2000 Used as primary for both me and my wife from August 2000 to July 2003. Sent for repairs. Came back for duty as......

in response to: The Cameras of Citynoise by ksedge

Chiamattt: [[img:14297]] Samsung SCH-V500 Cameraphone [[img:14298]] Nikon D1 (It looks better than it is. Its actually quite ancient) [[img:14299]] Nikon F4 (Was my primary camera up until about a year ago) ...

in response to: The Cameras of Citynoise by ksedge

Peter: i had a similar reaction while watching 5 transit cops overzealously enforcing a minor traffic stop in front of {newark penn station} (driving in the bus lane)... i was trying to photograph it with my......

in response to: Montreal Police Bicycle by EvilGentleman

t@ngent: i like how your cameraphone has taken a suitably 1970s style photograph of it too...

in response to: 1972 300sel by Peter

Peter: "do i have the right?" well, most people accept the tenet that anything done in public is in the public domain, unless otherwise specified. thats why cabs that use cc-tv warn you, thats why calls......

in response to: Mullets Galore! by Peter

Peter: another {etch} from the {q train} yesterday: [[img:12432]] sorry for the shitty {cameraphone} zoom quality... ...

in response to: JA: A True NYC King by Peter

Peter: cg: sally's photos are tons better (digicam v. cameraphone)... see above comment. sally: you should post the rest of the {coney island} photos you took... you got some nice ones! *grumble. i need my own digicam*...

in response to: School Busses by Peter

Michelle: Wow! I'm amazed that a cameraphone gives such good quality! Good for you!...

in response to: April 27th 2006: Cameraphone by Jamie

Chris Erb: Those are pretty good photos for a cameraphone. They add some neat ambiance to the pictures....

in response to: April 27th 2006: Cameraphone by Jamie

Jamie: It's easy to miss what's right beneath your nose. The things you see everyday when prevalent enough, blur into insignificance no matter how poignant their presence. Our government attempt to protect such things. Our heritage.......

in response to: Sound Mirrors by elaine

Peter: a sticker i saw on a similar {metrocard} vending machine in the {wtc} station this morning: [[img:10288]] the {cameraphone} pic makes it hard to make out, but it reads something like: ##"...WTC controlled demolition [undiscernable web-link] [[http://www.stopthelie.com]]......

in response to: If You See Something by GGP

EvilGentleman: Still think the whole package would be better if he was also selling used books. Oh, and Peter, the cameraphone seems pretty good, but maybe it would be better to just buy a compact point-and-shoot......

in response to: Lunch Truck by Peter

Peter: two {train}-related {empty reference}s: [[img:8965]] [[img:8966]] the commute home is never boring when youre on the lookout for citynoise {cameraphone} fodder! ...

in response to: empty reference repeat by elaine

Peter: wow! i used to work near that place. never went in though. if you have a {cameraphone}, do feel free to grab a snapshot and share it with us here......

in response to: C-Town Grocery by Peter

Peter: i used to have a {600}; most of my older cameraphone photos on here were from it. you an tell the photos from the 600 and 650 apart immediately, heh....

in response to: Sunrise in Brooklyn by Peter

joey: adam - 2 questions; how do you get your cameraphone pics on to your computer to send to citynoise? where in la is this?...

in response to: Apocalypse over Los Angeles by adam

Peter: its not particularly bold to make these sorts of series. remember that in {nyc}, one can get away with almost anything without raising much attention, particularly if suitable amounts of subtlety and tact are used.......

in response to: Christmas Eve\'s Eve by Peter

Peter: jamie- what cam are you using? these surely arent {Cameraphone} pix, eh? i hung out with a friend the past few nighs who is spending the year working in {london} and is back here visiting for......

in response to: December 30th 2005 by Jamie

Jamie: [[img:7154]] are you stalking me? If this is where i think it is then i was sat around here on wednesday night waiting for a lift. Took a bunch of photos using my crouched knee as......

in response to: Are You Going to Be Around Here for Christmas? by Zag

Peter: im pretty discrete with the {cameraphone}. also: i gotta second that when its in public, its everyone's business... ...

in response to: Guy Rolling a Blunt on the PATH Train by Peter

Peter: those have been there for a while... i just got around to uploading a bunch of old photos offa my {cameraphone}, heh... ive happened across some {pet bird} stuff that we dont have documented here (now,......

in response to: Rainy Day Bird by Peter

Peter: a bad photo that not only shows my {cameraphone}'s inability to zoom well in low light, but also a candid {graf trux} zipping around {brooklyn}: [[img:6418]] ...

in response to: Graf Trux 10: Back to Manhattan by Peter

Jamie: nice photos. i kinda like lofi toycam shots like these, but i know how frustrating it can be to wanna get a good hi-res shot when all ya got is lofi. What is it cameraphone?......

in response to: MONDAY MORNING WALKABOUT by MC

Peter: ill see what i can do. its hard to get good shots of moving quarry with the cameraphone, but theyre numerous enough- as are stop-lights, so maybe ill get lucky one of these days, heh....

in response to: Like Christ by Catherine Penfold-Waxman

jamie: also: what camera are you using? it's either a really old digital one, or a kickass cameraphone. either way, nice pics....

in response to: Battery park( NYC) memorials and sculptures by barry

Peter: hey! glad youre back. {cameraphone} shots are common enough around here- no worries :)...

in response to: video camera by steelisreal

Peter: hi-res {cameraphone} shot of {Cement Thing}: [[img:4188]]...

in response to: Cement Thing by Peter

Peter: now that i have a new/working cameraphone, its back to this series! in higher-res, no less! [[img:4153]]...

in response to: Commuters, WTC Station by Peter

Peter: mercury retrograde! and now i hold the brand new super mega awesome cameraphone in my hand, but they still havent activated/unlocked it yet... soon enough, though!...

in response to: Pet Bird in August by GGP

Peter: go for it moe! with my cameraphone broken, i havent made any photos in a couple of weeks... if you have some good shots, def post em......

in response to: Pet Bird in August by GGP

Peter: heh! i love the one where someone gave the bird a toupe a'la ballpoint pen. its funny when people edit... i saw a large {pet Bird} paste-up on the mailbox in front of Beast some......

in response to: Pet Bird in August by GGP

Peter: heh! i love that you caught a shot whilst the dont/walk sign was blank! reminds me of the photos i made of the blackout when times square was completely dark. rare indeed. also: my cam is......

in response to: Pet Bird at Night by kc

Peter: kc: i have such stealthy techniques for using the {cameraphone}... odds are no one noticed (at least i hope, though it does look like the woman on the left in the second photo is totally......

in response to: Subway Troubadour by Peter

Jamie: No, that would be cool. All my cameraphone stuff is photoshopped....

in response to: 2, 3, 4 by Jamie

Peter: thanks yall. i really need to head out like this and just snap photos with the digital cam more... ive been tied to the {cameraphone} too much lately, heh....

in response to: Washington Avenue, Prospect Heights by Peter

Jamie: good innit! it's just me {nokia} {cameraphone}. it goes all antiquey when its really sunny out...

in response to: Cagthorpe by Jamie

Peter: yeah i walked around last night with the digital camera... a nice change from the usual lofi {cameraphone} stuff, huh? :)...

in response to: New Pet Bird Stickers? by Peter

Peter: nice to see new shots, jamie! are tehse {cameraphone} shots? cool....

in response to: Shadows by Jamie

Peter: jeeff, i love entries like this. great photos, plus you get to read captions for them. it reads like a book. i especially love the ##fuji tv headquarters##. that building is a trip... and i......

in response to: big architecture by jeeff

Peter: ive noticed the "old" {pet bird} stickers too... and have unfortunately never had my camera handy... theres a strange one on the opposite-side parking sign in front of the ##half## winebar (on vanderbilt- down the......

in response to: Pet Bird Nestlings by GGP

Peter: strangely, the other day i snapped a {cameraphone} photo of said building... its low quality, but i felt compelled to add it to this thread :) [[img:2023]]...

in response to: Park Slope by Anna

elaine: aaargh! thing is i am a technophobe at heart and while i ##have## a cameraphone, and have taken pictures with it, i have no download smarts, so am all retarded about these things until they......

in response to: 3 Mornings by Jamie

Jamie: people, yes! it's easier with a {cameraphone}. Less conspicous...

in response to: 3 Mornings by Jamie

Peter: jamie: i just went down to my office's {cafeteria} to scope out the scene for {french fries}... [[img:1937]] **before:** 100% pre-fab foodservice {chips} with hot pepper sauce and extra salt... ##({cameraphone} photo of {fries} in front of......

in response to: Chips for Lunch by Jamie

Peter: yay {cameraphone} photos! :D...

in response to: Baby in Danger! by JJ

Jamie: what an interesting {commute}. i like these photos peter. your {cameraphone} is tip top...

in response to: World Trade Center Map by Peter

Peter: also: im pleased with how some of my {cameraphone} pics are turning out lately. i think im finally getting the hang of what sort of light i need, as well as getting good at tweaking......

in response to: The Daily Commute by Peter

Peter: im not obsessed, just happened to post two {vanishing point} entries this week :) yeah theyre {cameraphone} shots... thus the lowres. i gotta get in the habit of carrying the real digicam around, one of these......

in response to: Track 5, Newark Penn Station by Peter

Peter: well, the lomo is much higher res than my cameraphone, as it takes actual 35mm film and has a glass lens and stuff... but yeah, the color saturation is very similar!...

in response to: Zone & Shrub by Peter

Peter: i just now noticed the woman in the second photo... seems she ws not amused by my photo-taking, heh. viva le cameraphone!...

in response to: Sky & Train by Peter

Peter: similar but different... as in, the space is similar... the ramp you can see biscecting the middle photo is very much still there, and is the only entrance to "the hole" as far as i......

in response to: Ground Zero: lower Manhattan as it looks today by Peter

elaine: and now you've made this...out of an old sqeezy bottle and some sticky backed plastic - as they would make everything out of in 'blue peter' the UK kids programme, how did you do it?......

in response to: A Walk Through Brick City by Peter

elaine: well I'm liking the lomo reference, and saving yourself the trouble joining the lomo set (and the money) but then I also like the idea of lo tec hi tec, which cameraphones kind of are......

in response to: A Walk Through Brick City by Peter

Peter: kelsey, heh! yeah, the strange reddish and purplish hues come from the cameraphone... i installed a hack to get better saturation (think: lomo-like cameraphone!) which, though drastically improving the resolution/saturation of the photos, causes those hues.......

in response to: A Walk Through Brick City by Peter

Peter: sorta, but not this bright. thats the low-quality of my cameraphone :)...

in response to: The Endless Hallway by Peter

MoeRex: This sort of thing is all over SF, though I don't know exactly which gangs are involved. I generally don't photograph it because it's not aesthetically interesting to me. But these shots are fairly interesting--the......

in response to: Crip/Blood Graffiti: Washington Heights by anon