Monday, December 19th 2005

also: read the articles posted on Monday, December 19th 2005

Previous Day :: Next Day

elaine: i am ashamed to say i do not know. i watched it randomly and it took me a while to realise how good it was and i just never caught that info. so sorry, i am usually good for that kind of detail. guardian and granta are of the same lefty...

in response to Grubbin\'

elaine: o my god you have TOTALLY freaked me out now. last night i was imagining my brain was a coral reef, it is connected to a breathing meditation where i imagine my nostril hairs are seaweed, and it was only a short hop to brain = coral.

in response to Brains For Sale

elaine: that strikes me as mental

in response to City Cabbages

elaine: a hawk would take that white one thinking it a lamb

in response to Dogs and Man

BZZZP: oof! it's all about the composition and colors of the first pic. hawt.

in response to Interstate 87

ian: vz, after googling, I've seen and remembered several of his paintings, although I was not directly familiar with his name. Lately I've been thinking that maybe I should study 'art', at least, the accepted canon of work in fields that interest me, to give more perspective to the photographs I...

in response to No Title

BZZZP: wouldn't it make more sense to just paint in the negative space a color distinct from that of the original wall?

in response to only tease clits

flash: the big one's a roller

in response to only tease clits

GGP: elaine, what is the name of the documentary?

in response to Grubbin\'

mobie: law suit. birthday suit. suits me fine.

in response to Copyright? What Copyright?

Catherine Penfold-Waxman: Right-o, go ahead. If you like wearing a law suit. (ha!)

in response to Copyright? What Copyright?

GGP: they certainly stand up to the cold when everything else (save the ivy) has withered away.

in response to City Cabbages

mobie: trademark schmademark! if i wanna call my garden outbuldings delivery company ShedEx i frickin will. ok lady?!

in response to Copyright? What Copyright?

Catherine Penfold-Waxman: Yah boooo! Sucks to you! No, not really. Ian, you are completely correct. FedEX is a registered trade mark.

in response to Copyright? What Copyright?

Catherine Penfold-Waxman: I'll take the one named 'Abby Normal.'

in response to Brains For Sale

Catherine Penfold-Waxman: Glorious pictures. Really atmospheric. A real treat. (The will to laud photos is with me, the command of the English language is not.)

in response to No Title

Pkmadmatt: SporadiC:You said some stuff that isnt striclty true. UrbanFreeflow is NOT the WORST source of information about the 'real' pk. However it is not the best either. But i think you should have some respect to all the people behind it, because it has encouraged thousands to start the discipline. Although...

in response to Le Parkour: An Introduction

GGP: elaine: ah, yes. the essay you linked to appears as the preface to the edition I read and provides a nice bit of context for this very idiosyncratic book. if you read it, i will be interested in your reaction to it.

in response to Grubbin\'

vz: do you know fernand leger?

in response to No Title

elaine: good theme

in response to No Title

ian: I spent nearly an hour photographing the two men repairing the switching mechanism for the light-rail train. I felt that posture was appropriate because it was only a block or two from the (magnificently beautifully restored) Islamic Dawah Center. It fits in with my worker series -- my almost religious...

in response to No Title

elaine: yeah, i was really struck by that one too, it looks like a prayermat posture, quite a double entendre

in response to No Title

Previous Day :: Next Day