![]() | ||
| What is Citynoise?..... Today's posts..... This month..... Recent Comments..... Contact..... RSS Feed.... Post your own Citynoise..... | ||
| http://www.citynoise.org | ||
browse by city
Brooklyn, NY (1188) popular articles
Studio Visit with Skeleton Krewe Chris recent articles
Road Trip Sights browse by author
Peter (1298) hot topics
hot sixy girl bf photo |
Coney Island Deconstruction
[previous] :: [next]after all i'd read about the end of coney island as we know it, i had to go for a look in person. it's an eerie, empty shell of it's former self - then again, that's what's been said about coney island for the last hundred years...
brooklyn new york city coney island boardwalk development astroland This article has been viewed 27348 times in the last 4 years FPM: 26th Jan 2009 - 20:15 GMTI'm really glad you took the time to actually go there and take these photos and put them here. I haven't been there in years, and after hearing all about what's changing there, I had hoped to see it again, and now I have, vicariously. So what exactly are they tearing down Coney Island for? A mall? Condominiums? *SIGH* more NYC History down the drain in the chase for that almighty $....... luna park: 30th Jan 2009 - 15:58 GMTyeah, i think the developers had hopes of building luxury condos and a giant mall, but in this economic climate, i doubt much of anything will be built here anytime soon... AP: 30th Jan 2009 - 16:01 GMTThat's one of my biggest complaints about big-city "developers". They scheme to swoop in and buy up areas that usually contain a lot of public sentiment, raze them, then leave them sitting vacant and blighted until they plan/save/motivate enough to do something with them. When I heard of the Thor Equities plan to take over Coney Island, I knew this would happen, and it made me sick. I had hoped that NYC would at least make them wait until they had a firm plan and timeline in effect, but.... I guess it is all private property after all :-( Jack: 25th Sep 2009 - 17:27 GMTMaybe if they had made improvements, more people would go there. Whoever is responsible for running that place failed, not the developers. Djoo: 25th Sep 2009 - 17:46 GMTHow amazing and also sad :-( Jack, I bet it might be that the developers ran out the people running Coney Island. Anyone know? I'm not from there. Westside Woman Santa Cruz: 25th Sep 2009 - 19:04 GMTDamn. I really hoped to see Coney Island one day. I've wanted to go there ever since I saw the movie "The Little Fugitive" when I was a kid. Folks, they did the very same thing to Playland at The Beach in my hometown, San Francisco, in 1974. Westside Woman Santa Cruz: 25th Sep 2009 - 19:06 GMTI hope they never take down the Santa Cruz Boardwalk! Heather: 25th Sep 2009 - 19:09 GMTThese photos show a tenderness for the place and at the same time a real vacancy and sense of abandonment. Such nice photos for such a cathartic time for CI. And to Jack and Djoo, theres a lot more to the story than saying that the people who ran Astroland allowed it to fail. At best, I would say that the $30,000,000 price tag they were being offered was hard to resist. Read more here en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astroland Joseph Loughlin: 3rd Nov 2009 - 02:56 GMTI went to Steeplechase at Coney Island in the 1930.s as a kid and it was like going to another planet. Absolutley fantastic! I guess we've just gotten too sophisticated to enjoy such things now. I also worked at Coney as a "beachcomber." ( ie: garbage collector)for the Parks Dept. in 1943. We used to see stuff wash up on the beach from ships that had been torpeded by German Subs right outside New York Harbor. Comment on this article..[previous] :: [next] |
search citynoise.orgrecent discussions
America's Most Boring Towns: 8
from the archivesrecently viewed
Coney Island Deconstruction |
concept and content © citynoise.org 2002 - 2012:: designed and maintained by
Jamie and
Peter
caveat: entries and comments on citynoise.org represent
the views of their respective authors; this is an open forum, open to
all relevant ideas,
and as such, sees minimal editorial interference. as such, all content
on this site remains property of its creator/author, and is therefore
protected by all applicable copyright laws.
| ||