citynoise.org
What is Citynoise?..... Today's posts..... This month..... Recent Comments..... Contact..... RSS Feed.... Post your own Citynoise.....
http://www.citynoise.org  

browse by city

Brooklyn, NY (1053)
New York, NY (911)
Toronto, ON (800)
Montreal, QC (419)
London, UK (307)
Houston, TX (285)
Philadelphia, PA (198)
Seattle, WA (190)
Oakland, CA (182)
Queens, NY (164)
complete city list

popular articles

1990s NYC Graffiti: Part 8
from: Peter
A Dish Best Served Wet & Warm
from: Peter
Wheels of Soul Motorcycle Club
from: Peter
There Once Was a House...
from: Mikee
Russian Army Freight Transport
from: belyz
what's hot this month?

recent articles

Trike Blastin'
from: serlingrod
Illuminite
from: Patrick
Painting the Town
from: Robert
To All the People Who Think This Is a Sex Shop
from: Luke
Mininon 2: Now with Hats Gorra!
from: Peter
SPASHAL OFeR
from: Ender
Hello Operator...
from: Mikee
DV-2011... Have You Apply Yet!
from: Peter
Hand Job, Grand Opening!
from: Ender
Abandoned Church
from: Mikee
read all today's articles

browse by author

Peter (1178)
joey (326)
jack (309)
EvilGentleman (285)
hool (247)
complete author list

hot topics

افلام سكس
نيك
hot sixy girl bf photo
sex imag
photo woman s e x
abandoned
parkour
photo six woman
my bits
kid pk graffiti
ينيك
زب
teen six girl
please sixy sixy girls
زب كس

Long Time Gone

- Joe - Tuesday, April 12th, 2005 : goo

[previous] :: [next]

These three Victorian houses once overlooked downtown Los Angeles from a position on Bunker Hill. Though they survived into my lifetime, I have no memory of them. All I can recall on that stretch of the east side of the 300 block of south Olive Street is a parking lot. They were quite splendid, still, in this 1960 photograph.

Their site today is occupied by the large development to which the Angel's Flight funicular railway was moved a number of years ago. In fact, if the house on the right were still there, the top of the railway (formerly about half a block north, at Third Street) would probably be right outside its southern windows- and about twenty feet down, as some 40 feet was removed from the hill's top with redevelopment. I've not seen the new development, except in pictures, but I doubt that I'd like it. I tend to react badly to the urban vacuities which have replaced the subtle and complex patterns of the old city.

These houses have probably been gone a bit more than half as long as they stood. Their site was vacant for decades after they were destroyed. I wonder if what has replaced them will survive as long as they did? If not, I wouldn't be apt to miss it. Undoubtedly, it could easily be replaced by something better. This stately row was not. I'm not sorry that I haven't seen whatever is in this location now, but I wish I could remember having seen these houses.

image 655

This article has been viewed 4444 times in the last 5 years


borutz: 2nd Mar 2005 - 15:13 GMT

such a pretty photos! also i am like the new homepage look it is really good for the new look and easily to go around on.

hasslehoff: 2nd Mar 2005 - 15:39 GMT

it is something of great interest to me to see old photographs of places familiar to me. to see what has been and gone. what was and what is now. it is interesting to see how development is not necessarily synonymous with progress.

these building were pretty.

elaine: 23rd Apr 2005 - 07:58 GMT

Joe, looking through your articles here, it seems amazing to me that you even attempt to live in Los Angeles, with your sensibility. I mean, there are some nooks and crannies, but it does strike me as being generally pretty harsh and car based, wheras you seem to be the kind of contemplative soul perfect for, I dunno, Venice, or somewhere?

Lili: 12th Jun 2005 - 13:41 GMT

In a certain way the photos, the description and the comments make me think of how the values of those who control large material interests, such as money or realestate, are often, it appears, not balanced; makes me think of one of John Carpenter's (sp?) early
flicks called "Dark Star". In one scene there is this astronaut crying from having been
in the coldness of deep space for so long, all he wanted to do was to "go surfing just
once again". I think developers can actually profit much more by taking a little more
time to openly and in a relaxed manner consider inovative ways to "bring in" and fulfill considerartions that typically they would throw by the wayside to the detriment
of all people. A more encompassing approach. Consider human psychology, wildlife, the environment in general, etc. There are numerous areas where improvement can be had cost-effectively. Nice old homes, old buildings; be nice if people today, especially
those who had not seen these, could see them.

EvilGentleman: 17th Jul 2006 - 08:18 GMT

I find it absolutely incredible that historical stuctures are valued so little in a land where they are so rare. I could understand Europeans not being terribly attached to hundred-year-old buildings, but they also have Roman ruins and Gothic cathedrals. Over here, these Victorian buildings are often the oldest structures around, yet nobody cares. If you look at the way the historic parts of many North American cities are preserved, it seems that the missionaries came and left a few scattered museums, and then a few hundred years later, skyscrapers, pareking lots, shopping malls and apartment blocks filled in the gaps. Most cities have no historical continuity, just the very earliest stuff and the modern. What a disgraceful lack of respect for all the people that spent hundreds of years to build the missions into the cities we know today.

mariesandoval: 20th Apr 2007 - 19:13 GMT

This saddens me. The victorian homes have so much life in them. The beauty within it self shows it. Why would anyone destory such beauty. To build other buildings that we have enough of. We need to be reminded on how life is to short for us-not to be able to enjoy what these homes give to us. Which is Happiness just by looking back to the past and how everyone was happy - to help each other when needed. Because the warmth of the house gave the warmth within us. Thats the way it should be. Thats what i see when i look at this photo of the victorian houses. Joe thanks for your for trying your best to recall on what you can. Maybe not everyone shares my point of view-but each house as a story to tell. Just look and you can see. april 19-07

Comment on this article..

Name:

Type your comment here: Upload photos (opens in popup window)

[previous] :: [next]

search citynoise.org

recent discussions

Yuba
from: Paul G
JA: A True NYC King
from: Peter
America's Most Boring Towns: 10
from: Scott Sargent
My Unusual Hobby
from: Ralph Enderby
NYC Style Graffiti Throw Up
from: Metro1
You Know You're in Montreal When...
from: EvilGentleman
Graf on the Tracks, Pt. 3
from: Peter
Barge Train in the Fog
from: CartLegger
Bushwick 77: The Casusos of Harman St.
from: upfromflames
Graf on the Tracks, Pt. 7
from: Peter

from the archives

Colour and Texture: Metro Lionel Groulx


Colour and Texture: Metro Lionel Groulx

recently viewed

Long Time Gone
from: Joe
Mural At Brasil
from: groovehouse
May 13, 2007
from: chiamattt
Sep 16 2007 Toronto
from: hool
Rainy Day View
from: joey
Commerce Building
from: Franny Wentzel
Going Home
from: jack
Farewell Basswood Tree
from: Tyfoid Kid
Jesus and LED
from: Catherine Penfold-Waxman
The Dreamer
from: Cosmo