|What is Citynoise?..... Today's posts..... This month..... Recent Comments..... Contact..... RSS Feed.... Post your own Citynoise.....|
browse by city
Kinning Park Lives
browse by author
hot sixy girl bf photo
[previous] :: [next]
This article has been viewed 10388 times in the last 7 years
Catherine Penfold-Waxman: 16th Dec 2005 - 18:28 GMT
Kudos goes to my friend Jackie, she's the one with the eagle eye. I walked right past it. Then we both scambled for cameras.
Peter: 16th Dec 2005 - 18:29 GMT
hahaha! excellent catch, cat! thats funny. ive never seen "BevEx" before...
ian: 18th Dec 2005 - 01:03 GMT
To be pedantic, that's Trademark infringement, not copyright infringement :)
Catherine Penfold-Waxman: 19th Dec 2005 - 14:25 GMT
Yah boooo! Sucks to you! No, not really. Ian, you are completely correct. FedEX is a registered trade mark.
mobie: 19th Dec 2005 - 15:28 GMT
trademark schmademark! if i wanna call my garden outbuldings delivery company ShedEx i frickin will. ok lady?!
Catherine Penfold-Waxman: 19th Dec 2005 - 15:53 GMT
Right-o, go ahead. If you like wearing a law suit.
Peter: 11th Jan 2006 - 17:28 GMT
heh. we covered that in this entry... ;)
Catherine Penfold-Waxman: 11th Jan 2006 - 21:29 GMT
I only fairly recently (3 years ago) discovered the arrow in the negative space. Which is very sad, as I have two dregrees in graphic design and have worked in advertising for 13 years.
Peter: 2nd Oct 2006 - 14:55 GMT
zagg: i bet you got alot of cool fed ex schwag, eh?
Cameo: 2nd Oct 2006 - 16:10 GMT
They didn't infringe though... the EX from fedEX features an arow inside the "EX" the Bevex modified their graphic enough to not infringe on the trademar "EX" Look closely at the EX... you will see a hidden arrow!
zagg: 4th Oct 2006 - 03:08 GMT
None what so ever, ALTHOUGH! I did get an awfully nice meeting with my boss letting me know my temp. position was ending 3 months early: 3 days after christmas!
Also worked with racists homophobes each day, driving me nut-balls.
But I'm not bitter, no...
Dude: 4th Feb 2007 - 16:13 GMT
"To be pedantic, that's Trademark infringement, not copyright infringement :)"
On top of that to further it mnore, if you talk about theft and copyright infringement in the same sentence, you fail. One or the other, they aren't the same... at least the way I was brought up, it was not right but last time I checked calling it something it wasn't made it even more confusing and unclear.
Snant: 22nd Jan 2013 - 20:20 GMT
Usa pharmacy cialis
Comment on this article..
[previous] :: [next]
from the archives
concept and content © citynoise.org 2002 - 2012:: designed and maintained by
caveat: entries and comments on citynoise.org represent
the views of their respective authors; this is an open forum, open to
all relevant ideas,
and as such, sees minimal editorial interference. as such, all content
on this site remains property of its creator/author, and is therefore
protected by all applicable copyright laws.